Skip to main content


According to the latest report published by the IRENA agency, investment costs for the construction of electricity generating facilities around the world are decreasing for all types of renewable energy sources, but this is especially noticeable for solar energy and wind power plants. In fig. 1 shows a comparison of electricity prices for small and medium-sized installations in the utility sector from 2010 to 2017. Figures for 1 kWh are based on the US dollar exchange rate in 2016 (comparison base). A rather large scatter of individual indicators (almost 4 times for PV and more than 2 times for CSP stations) is explained by the wide geography of the localization of solar installations, climate, local regulatory rules and lending rates that affect the total cost of 1 kW of installed capacity, taking into account all costs (BoS). The averaged data show that PV generation over 8 years has fallen in price by 3, 6 times for PV plants in the entire power range. The decrease in PV energy costs since 2010 has been staggering and exceeded all expectations - the total present value of electricity (LCOE) for new PV projects commissioned in 2017 decreased by 73% compared to 2010 - to $ 0.10 per 1 kWh.

New renewable energy projects have already come close or are already in the price range of hydrocarbon solar energy generation. (The range of costs for generating energy from fossil fuels for the G20 countries in 2017 was estimated in the range from $ 0.05 to $ 0.17 per 1 kWh.)

Renewable energy will soon be universally cheaper than most fossil fuels. It is expected  that by 2020 all commercial renewable solar energy technologies will be in the range of the cost of electricity from combusted hydrocarbons, with most renewable energy technologies being at or even lower than fossil fuel generation prices.

The diameter of the circle shows the capacity of the project, its center - the value of the cost for this project (Y-axis). The lines show the LCOE level for units commissioned in the corresponding year. Strip - the range of costs for generating energy from fossil fuels. The LCOE value for each technology is the ratio of the lifetime cost to electricity generation over the lifetime, adjusted for a discount rate that reflects the average cost of capital. In this IRENA report, all LCOE results are calculated assuming a real cost of capital of 7.5% in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries and China and 10% in the rest of the world.

One often hears criticism that the price cuts are almost non-existent in the small PV home power sector (located mainly on rooftops). IRENA's research refutes such claims It is clear that for large plants the average aggregate indicators for the generation cost will be better than for small ones. However, the cost of residential PV modules has dropped by about 4/5, making custom PV systems for housing now 2/3 cheaper than in 2010, and the cost of PV projects for the utility sector has decreased by 68%.

With the proliferation of solar technology, LCOE-based cost analysis is becoming more accurate. The IRENA RES database now includes indicators for> 750,000 small home and ~ 15,000 utility PV systems in OECD countries.

Three key factors in reducing average global costs:

1. Improving technology

Following the decline in prices for PV modules in the period 2010-2017, the average LCOE of solar stations decreased by 69% (see Fig. 1) and will continue to decline until 2022 (the horizon of this forecast), becoming competitive with the price of solar energy from fossil fuel

Due to an 81% decline in solar PV module prices since the end of 2009, as well as a decrease in the book value of the entire system (BoS), the global weighted average LCOE for PV plants for the period 2010-2017 decreased by 73% to $ 0. 10 / kW • h. Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) technology has also reduced costs, although it is still in its infancy in terms of breadth of implementation. The global LCOE for CSP is now $ 0.22 per kWh. However, the auctions in 2016 and 2017. for CSP projects with commissioning in 2020 and later show a further gradual decline - costs for CSP will also come out to $ 0.10 per kWh.

New solar PV cells are more efficient. Real-time data collection and big data technology have improved predictive services for generation and reduced operating and maintenance (O&M) costs. The advent of modular designs and the mass production of all PV system components have significantly reduced these cost items in BoS. Modular, scalable solar technology and replication in project development also result in continuous cost savings.

Technological improvements remain at the core of the potential for reducing renewable solar energy costs. At the same time, the achieved technology maturity and proven experience in the use of renewable energy sources now reduce project risks, which reduces the cost of borrowed capital for the implementation of renewable energy projects. Reducing prices opens up new opportunities for the use of RES

2. Competitive (auction) purchases

Competitive procurement, including open auctions, has so far had little impact on the global distribution of renewable energy sources. However, these mechanisms reduce costs very quickly in new markets. shows data on actual LCOE and auction prices from 2010 to 2022.

The results of the latest RES auctions for projects commissioned in the coming years confirm that cost reductions will continue until 2020 and beyond. Currently, the IRENA Database with the results of auctions and other competitive procurement processes contains about 7000 projects.

Auctions provide important price signals about future trends in electricity costs: LCOE of individual projects could drop to $ 0.03 per kWh as early as 2018, while global average costs for PV generation could drop to $ 0.06 per kWh ... The results of the auctions show that by 2020 the CSP technology will provide electricity at prices ranging from $ 0.10 to $ 0.06 per kWh.

The logarithmic scale in facilitates the interpretation of descent curves by showing solar energy them as straight lines. A decrease in prices for the period from 2010 to 2020 for CSP will be at the level of 30% (the expansion of use will be ~ 89% of the total installed capacity by the end of this period), and for PV technologies, the decrease will be ~ 35% (with an increase in the commissioning of new capacities by 94% by the end of the forecast interval). It is expected that by 2020 the total installed capacity of CSP will be 12 GW, PV stations 650 GW.

3. Internationalization of projects

Global competition promotes the universal application of the world's best project development practices, leads to a decrease in technological costs, project risks and an increase in the efficiency of the use of renewable energy sources, to a reduction in construction and installation costs, to a reduction in O&M costs, etc., to a greater extent than when -or before. Serial and mass production of components for renewable solar energy plants have significantly reduced production costs.

International corporations have joined the RES business, thanks to which, in a number of developing countries, RES has become cheaper than hydrocarbon generation. In developed countries, solar energy has become cheaper than from new nuclear power plants.



Popular posts from this blog


The pink diamond is one of the rarest gems in the world. Its pure natural color could be seen only by a few people working in jewelry. For the first time, a Pink diamond was found in Brazil, and then in India and Australia. The unusual color of the stone has not yet been fully studied. There are several different assumptions about the origin of the diamond shade. The first of them suggests that such a  Pink diamond  appeared due to the simultaneous exposure to high temperature and pressure for hundreds and thousands of years. The second, that the mineral was joined by impurities in the form of manganese and ferruginous ores. At the moment, pink diamond has over 20 shades. The pure color of the stone without admixtures of other shades is very rare, and their price reaches $ 1 million per carat. Very often, colors such as purple, orange, brown and yellow are mixed with a gem. The first two colors increase the cost, and the last two decrease. The saturation of the diamond is equally impo

Coin Collector What do I need to know?

  Being a coin collector is not for everyone, in fact, many consider this to be boring and pointless. However, this is a matter of taste and if you are fascinated by this world, welcome you as it is one of the most beautiful hobbies there is. To begin with, each coin itself is an art and has an extremely long and interesting history behind it. In fact, a single coin can tell us a lot about history, geography and politics. The latter means that it is an excellent way to gain knowledge, but it can also be used to earn money. In fact, if they are quite old coins we can obtain large sums of money, and over time they gain more value. This does not mean that the "most recent" are not worth so much, since it is the opposite. To understand this, you should know that their price fluctuates according to the metal with which they are made. Perhaps, for a novice collector, this may seem strange but the more experienced do know how to make their investment and how much money they


Investments in precious stones are protected from ruble devaluation and sharp price fluctuations. But diamonds and rough diamonds are not exchange commodities, and the determination of the real value of precious stones involves many nuances that a private investor needs to know about. Promising direction Diamonds and polished Diamond investment are alternative investments that do not bring super-profits, but preserve investments and increase them in the long term. Mark Twain's advice can be attributed to diamonds: "Buy land - it is no longer produced." Deposits of diamonds are shrinking and their value is constantly increasing. From 1960 to 2015, the price of gemstones increased tenfold, but the diamond market still fluctuates. Return on investments in rough and polished diamonds averages 10% per year, but sometimes drops to 4%. Thus, from 2008 to 2015, the over saturation of the diamond market and a decrease in demand for diamonds in China and India led to a decrease in